PIRG fundraiser fires entire bargaining team


FIRED BY THE FUND: In the last 13 months, seven union activists have been fired at a 30-employee call center run by the Fund for the Public Interest. The Fund is the fundraising wing of the national PIRG network which includes OSPIRG, CALPIRG and groups like Environment Oregon and Environment Colorado. Above, six of the fired workers join their former co-workers for a Nov. 14 protest walkout. From left: Ben Woodhouse, David Neal, Cortina Robinson, Mike Schultz, Kris Humbird, and Wael Elasady.

After 18 months on the phone raising money for consumer and environmental groups, David Neal was fired — by phone — on Election Day. He’s the seventh openly pro-union worker fired by the nonprofit Fund for the Public Interest since a union campaign began among its Portland call center employees last fall. Headquartered in Boston, the Fund for the Public Interest is the fundraising arm for state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs) and spinoff groups like Environment Oregon and Environment Colorado. In 2010, the Fund raised $26.5 million through door-to-door and sidewalk canvasses in 40 states, as well as through phone calls to donors from call centers in Boston, Sacramento and Portland.

[pullquote]They were looking for a reason to get rid of me for a long time” — David Neal, union activist at the Fund for Public Interest[/pullquote]Last October, workers at the Fund’s Portland call center voted 19-5 to join Communications Workers of America Local 7901 — not because they wanted a pension or even a wage increase, but because they wanted an end to draconian pay and discipline policies. Hourly pay rises 50 cents every 80 hours if workers meet fundraising targets, but drops up to several dollars when they fail to meet the targets. And workers are fired if they fail to meet a separate benchmark two weeks in a row — regardless of how long they’ve worked for the Fund.

David Neal

Pat Wood — who’s in charge of the Fund’s three call centers — flies to Portland from Boston once a month for negotiations over a first-time union contract. But in over a year of bargaining, the Fund hasn’t agreed to any significant changes, and in that time it has fired six members of the union bargaining team — all of the original four (Neal was the last), plus two workers who took the place of fired workers. [Each time a member of the bargaining team is fired, another worker steps forward to take his or her place.]

It’s against federal labor law to fire a worker for participating in a labor organization. Local 7901 filed charges protesting the firings, but the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) dismissed the cases, citing a lack of evidence that their union involvement was a factor in the firings. In each case, the Fund said workers were fired for other reasons. Wael Elasady was fired for missing a shift;  Kris Humbird was fired for calling in sick too late; Mike Schultz, Keets Nelson, and Cortina Robinson were fired for missing quota two weeks in a row; Ben Woodhouse was fired on accusation of being rude during phone conversations; and David Neal was fired on an accusation that he submitted false numbers in a phone report. In total, out of a 30-person workplace, the seven most openly pro-union workers — including all but one of the workers who were active in the original effort to unionize — were fired.

Neal disputes the accusation that he submitted false numbers, and says he was given no opportunity to defend himself.

“I knew I had a giant target on my back, but I kept my nose clean,” Neal said. “They were looking for a reason to get rid of me for a long time but I hadn’t given them one.”

Neal was told he was barred from returning to work, and his personal belongings were overnighted.

Wood (the Fund’s chief negotiator) declined to be interviewed, and referred questions to the Fund’s direct mail associate director, Caitlin Seeley. Seeley asked that questions be submitted via e-mail, and then declined to answer any of them, saying only that “the Fund has been, and will continue to, negotiate with the union in good faith.”

But Local 7901 disputes that claim in a charge of bad faith bargaining it filed Nov. 16 after the Fund worsened a previous offer. The NLRB is investigating the charge. The agency also issued a formal complaint against the Fund Sept. 17. The case is scheduled to be heard by a federal administrative law judge Jan. 22. That complaint stems from a June 29 walkout by employees. As workers left the office in protest, Portland call center director Referd Raley threatened to permanently close the office and fire everyone.

That’s a credible threat. The Fund used to have a call center in Los Angeles, until workers there unionized in 2005. Eleven months later, the Fund closed the doors, and moved the operation to Sacramento.

Pat Wood, left, is confronted by an impromptu labor and community delegation Nov. 14 as his employees march on the sidewalk outside.

But Portland call center workers have resolved not to be intimidated. They conducted another job action Nov. 14 in which 22 workers took part — joined by several dozen supporters. A kind of one-shift strike, it consisted of workers walking out, refusing to return, and picketing the worksite for an hour.

As it happened, Wood was sitting in a nearby cafe, so Local 7901 president Madelyn Elder put together an impromptu delegation. One by one, Oregon AFL-CIO president Tom Chamberlain and secretary-treasurer Barbara Byrd, Portland Jobs With Justice executive director Margaret Butler, and retired Catholic priest Bob Krueger introduced themselves and urged Wood to settle.

His response to each: “I understand.”

No further bargaining sessions are expected until January.


MORE: Previous Labor Press reports on the campaign.

IN THEIR OWN WORDS: David Neal and two other Fund callers explain their union campaign to cable access host Jim Lockhart. 

[UPDATE: The NLRB found that Neal’s firing DID violate federal labor law; it issued a complaint and set a June 2013 date for the case to be heard before a federal administrative law judge.]


  1. Actually, Jan if you’ve ever supported them before, support them now more than ever. If you get a call from someone trying to get you to renew with OSPIRG and you lecture them about the Fund’s labor record and ask to be taken off the call list, imagine you may have just spoken with a union contract negotiator on the verge of losing their job.

    Everyone involved in this call center- and in the PIRG movement-works there because of the campaigns these groups are running and we don’t get anything done without member support. I strongly urge you to reconsider.

  2. …and these organizations are the ‘good people’ of this country. Tells you what kind of country we actually live in when so called progressive groups engage in top down authoritarian rule.

  3. Isn’t something missing in this article? Who runs or operates these PIRGS? To my recollection OSPIRG is over thirty years old. My impression is that there is a nationwide network of these Public Interest Research Groups and that they were founded by Ralph Nader. Is that true? If so, does he, Nader still run or direct the organization? I do recall hearing that Unfair Labor Practices charges have been filed against his organizations in the past. Were the organizations, who the charges were filed against PIRGS?

    Basically my question is: Are these PIRGS part of a nationwide conglomerate with a long history of labor law violations? If so the public should be informed.

  4. Nader gave students the idea of starting student chapter PIRGS during a speech he gave in the 70’s. Later, off campus PIRGS started up and did great work for awhile. Things have changed drastically over the years to say the least.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read more