Trump moves to slash federal workers’ union rights

“This is a democracy, not a dictatorship. No president should be able to undo a law he doesn’t like through administrative fiat.” — American Federation of Government Employees president David Cox

By Don McIntosh

President Trump signed a trio of executive orders on May 25 to speed the process of firing federal employees, slash union officers’ use of paid time to defend federal workers, and order federal agencies to renegotiate union contracts.

“This is more than union busting – it’s democracy busting,” said J. David Cox Sr., AFGE national president, in a press statement reacting to the orders. “These executive orders are a direct assault on the legal rights and protections that Congress has specifically guaranteed to the 2 million public-sector employees across the country who work for the federal government.”

AFGE, which stands for American Federation of Government Employees, is the largest union of federal employees, with 318,000 members. On May 30 it filed a lawsuit asking that the order slashing paid union time be struck down by a federal court.

Trump’s Executive Order 13837 says no federal employee can spend more than a quarter of their paid time on union responsibilities. The order also limits total union paid-time hours to one hour per employee per year. [A report from Office of Personnel Management says the federal average is currently 2.95 hours of paid time per employee.] And the order requires agencies to bill unions at commercial market rates for use of meeting rooms, phones, computers, and other agency assets.

“The United States Constitution does not vest the president with the power to legislate,” AFGE said in the lawsuit. “[The order] seeks to impermissibly rewrite portions of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, which governs labor relations in the federal civilian workplace.”

Under that law, passed in 1978, union officers are allowed to fulfill their representational responsibilities using paid work time. The amount of paid time they may use is supposed to be “reasonable, necessary and in the public interest,” and is to be negotiated between the union and the employing agency. Paid time can’t be used to conduct union-specific business like soliciting members, holding union meetings, electing union officers, or engaging in political activities. AFGE argues that paid time saves taxpayers in the long run because it helps resolve workplace conflicts before they become costly, agency-wide problems.

Under the laws passed by Congress, federal government workplaces are open shops, akin to “right-to-work,” in that union membership and dues are strictly voluntary matters, and yet unions are obligated to defend all employees, whether they’ve joined or not.

And federal workers already have pretty limited union rights compared to private sector workers. They can’t strike, and they can’t negotiate over wages and benefits, which are set by Congress. So their unions’ ability to represent them when they face discipline is one of the most important union rights federal workers do have.

That’s what Executive Order 13837 is aimed at. It severely hampers unions’ ability to defend workers facing discipline — at the very same time that Executive Order 13839 makes it quicker and easier for federal employees to be fired.

Trump, who famously made “You’re fired” his signature catch-phrase, asked Congress in his February 2018 State of the Union address for greater authority to reward — or get rid of — federal workers. Congress hasn’t done that. Now Trump is trying to do it on his own authority.

Executive Order 13839 would tear up longstanding federal worker job security protections and replace them with something more like an “at will” work environment. Under the order:

  • Managers at federal agencies don’t have to use “progressive discipline” (a standard union protection in which discipline progresses from verbal or written warning to suspension or termination.)
  • Federal managers don’t have to be consistent in how they discipline employees: “Conduct that justifies discipline of one employee at one time does not necessarily justify similar discipline of a different employee at a different time,” the order says.
  • New hires have to go through a “probationary” period as the final step in the hiring process.
  • In the event of layoffs, seniority rights (a union policy that reduces management’s ability to reward favorites, and worker’s motivation to kiss up) would be replaced with manager-evaluated “performance” ratings.
  • Managers could also terminate employees for performance issues after 30 days. [Currently, federal employees get at least 60 to 120 days to show they can meet performance goals before being terminated.]

A third order, Executive Order 13836, directs federal agencies to renegotiate their union contracts to increase management authority to “reward high performers, hold low-performers accountable, or flexibly respond to operational needs.” It also says bargaining should not take more than a year.

“This president seems to think he is above the law, and we are not going to stand by while he tries to shred workers’ rights,” said AFGE president Cox Sr., in a press statement announcing the lawsuit. “This is a democracy, not a dictatorship. No president should be able to undo a law he doesn’t like through administrative fiat.”

1 Comment

  1. Why not? A president through executive order established public sector union collective bargaining in 1962.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.