U.S. Senate confirms Trump nominees to the NLRB

The federal agency that’s supposed to protect workers’ right to form a union may now be on track to reverse years’ worth of progress on workers’ rights. In a 49-to-47 party-line vote on Sept. 25, Republicans in the U.S. Senate confirmed William Emanuel, president Trump’s second nominee to the five-member National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). He follows Trump nominee Marvin Kaplan, who was confirmed Aug. 2 — also on a party-line vote. Together with Philip Miscimarra, who was named NLRB chairman by Trump in April, they make up the first Republican majority on the Board in nine years.

William Emanuel

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) calls the NLRB “one of the most important independent federal agencies that you’ve never heard of.” The NLRB is responsible for interpreting and administering the National Labor Relations Act, the federal law that protects workers’ right to join a union, take collective action, and strike.

The agency consists of two parts. The Office of the General Counsel employs 1,500 agents at 26 regional offices around the country. They oversee elections in which workers vote whether or not to unionize, and they investigate and prosecute allegations that employers or unions have committed “unfair labor practices.”

The other part of the agency is the five-member Board itself, which functions like a Supreme Court of labor law cases, issuing rulings that interpret the National Labor Relations Act. Under the Act, the president may appoint up to three members from his party to this Board. In practice, that has meant in recent years that the Board has toggled between pro-labor majorities under Democratic presidents and pro-business majorities under Republicans.

Marvin Kaplan

The National Labor Relations Act was never a strong law to begin with. Remedies for unfair labor practice violations are minimal, and the process for prosecuting them is slow.

But for the last eight years, the NLRB has worked hard to modernize, and to fulfill the law’s stated purpose, which is to encourage collective bargaining.

It’s likely many NLRB decisions that favored workers and unions will now be overturned, given the background of the new Trump-appointed majority.

Emanuel was an attorney for Littler Mendelson, one of the nation’s top antiunion law firms.

And as an attorney for a Republican House Committee, Kaplan drafted legislation to overturn Obama-era NLRB rulings and make it easier for employers to fight unionization campaigns. Before that, in the George W. Bush-era Department of Labor, he drafted newly onerous union “LM-2” reporting requirements.

“Mr. Emanuel has every right to spend his career representing corporations. But a guy who has never even once represented workers should not serve on the NLRB. An individual who has spent his career working with some of the most ruthless union busting firms, fighting off union efforts at every turn, has absolutely no business at the helm of an agency whose job is to encourage collective bargaining.”
— U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)
before the Sept. 25 confirmation vote.

Days before Emanuel’s confirmation, Trump also nominated former federal management-side labor lawyer Peter Robb to be the NLRB’s general counsel, its top enforcement officer.

Robb, now an attorney in Vermont, wrote the briefs and made the arguments to get President Ronald Reagan to fire the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) members after they went on strike in 1981 over safety issues.

Robb has been critical of recent NLRB decisions including protecting workers’ rights to use social media, the Board’s recently enacted rules removing some employer roadblocks to union representation elections, and a policy pushed by Griffin to hold both franchise holders — your local McDonald’s — and parent firms — McDonald’s headquarters — jointly responsible for obeying or breaking labor law.

If confirmed, Robb would succeed Richard Griffin, whose term expires in November. Before entering the NLRB post during the Obama Administration, Griffin was general counsel for the International Union of Operating Engineers.

No hearing date has been set.

(Editor’s Note: Press Associates Inc. contributed to this report.)


Five pro-worker NLRB reforms that are now threatened by Trump appointees

  • No more legal delays to union elections  It’s already a stacked deck: Employers can require workers to attend anti-union meetings, while excluding union organizers from the property. Under those conditions, delaying a union election gives employers more time to bust a union campaign. So employers used legal technicalities to delay elections. Then in 2015 the NLRB decided it would hold the elections first, and resolve employer legal challenges later. Business groups howled in protest at what they called the “ambush election” rule. It used to take 40-45 days to schedule a union election. Now it takes an average of 25 days.
  • Joint employers are still employers  Employers sometimes try to get out of the obligation to bargain with a union by dividing control between two entities, like a company and an outside staffing agency. But in 2015, the NLRB made it clearer that when two or more businesses share control over a worker’s terms of employment, they’re “joint employers” and still must deal with the union.
  • Grad students can be workers too  Colleges increasingly rely on low-paid grad students for teaching and research, while saying they’re students, not employees. But in 2016 the NLRB said they can indeed by employees, and therefore have the right to unionize.
  • No more employee handbooks that deny workers rights Even nonunion workers have rights under the NLRA, such as the right to talk with coworkers about conditions, and to take collective action. To protect those rights, the NLRB has been cracking down on employers for employee handbooks that say workers can’t tell coworkers how much they’re paid, or that ask workers to give up their right to class action suits.
  • Email and Facebook are the new water cooler If workers have the right to talk with each other about pay and conditions, that means they can talk about them on email or Facebook too, the NLRB has ruled. So employer rules barring those things are illegal.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*