Union to OHSU: Health workers need sick days


“I chose to work at OHSU nine years ago because I believe in the mission to improve the health and wellbeing of Oregonians,” said AFSCME Local 328 member Kasey Zimmer-Stucky at a June 13 union rally outside OHSU’s Mackenzie Hall. “I love my job. I love my co-workers. I love my patients. I’m proud of the work that we do. The fair contract that we’re asking for shows us that OHSU cares the same about building up its patients and employees as it does about building up their shiny city on Marquam Hill.”

By Don McIntosh

As an early signal that they’re unwilling to make concessions in their next union contract, over 1,000 AFSCME Local 328 members and supporters rallied June 13 outside the offices of executives at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). As a publicly owned hospital, university and research institution, OHSU is thriving, but in bargaining with AFSCME Local 328, management is proposing meager raises, takeaways on health insurance, and a new paid-time-off policy that would incentivize employees to work while sick.

Ultrasound technologist Kasey Zimmer-Stucky, a member of the AFSCME Local 328 bargaining team, said it’s been “disheartening” to see OHSU seeking to shift costs onto employees.

Local 328 represents close to 7,000 workers at OHSU, in over 300 job classifications.

They want raises: In contract negotiations, Local 328 is calling for a two-year contract with raises of 5% and 4%.

Members also want to be treated with respect, something they say HR director Hollie Hemenway failed to do at a recent bargaining forum. Just before their June 13 union rally, hundreds of members and supporters lined up along Sam Jackson Park Road in a kind of silent protest vigil, with Post-it notes covering their mouths. Why Post-it notes? Because at the June 5 forum, Hemenway refused to take questions. Instead she directed union members to write their questions on Post-it notes, then cherry picked which of those they wanted to answer.

The current contract is set to expire June 30. The two sides have been negotiating a new contract since February, but are still a considerable distance apart. For Local 328, the sticking points have been three items:

  • Paltry raises OHSU is proposing a three-year contract with annual raises of 1% for many workers [To be more specific, OHSU is proposing increases of 1.5 % overall, but then it wants to withhold 0.5 % of that to address “pay equity” issues for workers who have been underpaid.] Either way, those raises are less than annual inflation, which has ranged from 1.5 to 2.5% the last few years. Raises of 1 or 1.5% would have OHSU workers would be falling behind.
  • Concessions on paid time off Workers at OHSU currently have two separate paid leave accounts: vacation and sick time. OHSU is proposing a new Paid Time Off (PTO) system that puts them in the same basket. After employees use five sick days a year, any further sick days would come out of paid time off they could otherwise use for vacation. One problem with that: Most health care workers get sick more than five days a year, so the new policy would make them choose between working while sick and losing vacation time. OHSU is also proposing to create a new paid parental leave benefit — and fund it by cutting down the amount of paid time off workers can accrue. Right now workers are allowed to bank up to 250 hours of unused vacation — and cash that out when they leave or retire. The OHSU proposal would cut that to 40 hours. Workers who’ve been saving up vacation time for years as a nest egg would be forced to use it or lose it. Local 328 President Matt Hilton says the proposal is a non-starter: “We don’t have a mandate from our members to go to a PTO system, and we don’t really have an interest in fixing what isn’t broken.”
  • Shifting the cost of health insurance to employees Up to now, OHSU has been one of the rare employers to still provide fully paid health insurance coverage to employees, something that was once common. Now, OHSU is proposing that workers pay 5% of the premium for employee-only coverage. Workers who elect spousal coverage do currently pay 12% of the premium; OHSU wants to increase that to 17%. And there’s more: OHSU is proposing that if premiums go up more than 5%, workers would have to pay ALL of the increase above that. In other words, a public employer with $1.5 billion in reserves wants to shift the financial risk of unpredictable health cost increases off its balance sheet and onto its workers. And that’s not all. OHSU’s health insurance benefit covers employees and their spouses, but now OHSU is proposing a new charge of $100 a month for any employee spouses who enroll after having declined their own employer-sponsored health insurance. The spousal surcharge program would rely on the honor system, but if employees are later found to have violated the requirement, they could be disciplined up to and including discharge under OHSU’s proposal.

Labor and management negotiators began meeting with the help of a state mediator May 21, with further mediation sessions scheduled for June 18 and 28 and July 1 and 2. Under Oregon law, if they’re unable to reach agreement, either side could declare an impasse, which starts a clock ticking. After 37 days, would legally be allowed to strike. Local 328 hasn’t gone on strike at OHSU since 1995.


  1. Admin should be ashamed at what they are proposing for their staff. Shame on them. This is wrong in so many ways.

  2. Clarifying OHSU’s PTO proposal: Employees would be required to use 40 hours of PTO (vacation) specifically as sick time before they are allowed to access anymore of their sick time. If an employee gets sick and does not have enough PTO to cover 40 hours of sick time, or has not reached the 40 hour sick time requirement, they must take that time unpaid, even if they have enough hours in their sick bank to cover the absence.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read more