At Malarkey Roofing Products, talk of a strike

Share

By Don McIntosh, Associate editor

Labor relations have taken a turn for the worse at a North Portland roof shingle maker. Leaders of United Steelworkers Local 330 say family-owned Malarkey Roofing Products has hired a known union-buster to lead negotiations over a new contract for the plant’s 115 union workers.

United SteelworkersConsultant Jim Frazer of United Employers Association has proposed a near complete rewrite of the previous three-year contract, which expired May 31. Frazer is proposing to strip out key union provisions, and union bargaining team members think he may be trying to drag out negotiations until production slows after September.

Past negotiations were simple and short, says union Vice President Shawn Graham, a millwright at Malarkey. This time, managers began the negotiations saying they’d been too busy to come up with proposals.

“I said, ‘How could you be too busy? You had three years to get ready for this,’” Graham recalls. “‘I have another job besides this, and I came up with a proposal. And you have a lawyer and all these managers and you can’t come up with it?’”

“That was a pretty good indication right off the get-go that we were going to have problems,” says Local 330 President Bob Tackett, who’s also executive secretary-treasurer of the Northwest Oregon Labor Council. Tackett said he observed several bargaining sessions where part-owner Greg Malarkey seemed to want to be reasonable, but was silenced by Frazer, the consultant.

“To hear the guy tell the grandson of the founder to sit down and shut up was a little weird, to say the least,” Tackett said.

Malarkey Roofing has been family owned since Herbert Malarkey founded it in 1956. His son Michael Malarkey, president since 1975, died in 2012. The company has done extremely well in the last five years, Graham said. For about eight months of the year, the plant is in operation 24 hours a day. Workers have achieved productivity increases of 10 percent a year, and are now putting out 1.9 million shingles a week at the Portland plant, with no lost-time accident in the last three years. The company has also expanded, adding production facilities in South Gate, California, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Both are nonunion.

Under the union contract in Portland, wages range from $16.50 to $25.96, depending on job classification. But workers also get lots of overtime, including double-time for some weekend work: During high season, employees work eight-hour shifts 13 days in a row, followed by one Sunday off.

But now the company is proposing changes to 28 pages of a 32-page contract. It wants to add 21 causes for immediate termination (the current policy is standard union “just cause” language requiring progressive discipline.) And the profitable company is proposing annual raises of just 1 percent (the union proposes 5 percent). Malarkey also proposes to pay $6.1 million to withdraw from the union’s multi-employer pension plan. Instead, the company  proposes to match employee contributions to a 401(k). [The union counterproposes that Malarkey put its current $1.37-an-hour pension contribution into a 401(k).]

Malarkey also is proposing to get rid of two key union provisions: its obligation to deduct union dues from paychecks, and any requirement that employees become union members. The provisions are known as “dues checkoff” and “union security.”

“Trying to get rid of union security is the first step toward breaking down our union,” explains bargaining team member Tom Souther. “People could come and have all the benefits and not have to pay for it.”

As a consultant, Frazer has a decades-old history of involvement in bitter union disputes, including a 22-month strike at Voith Sulzer in 1996 in which 65 Machinists were permanently replaced; an 11-month strike by 65 members of United Auto Workers at Williams Controls in 2002; and a four-month strike at Cummins Northwest in 1999, where the strategy of permanent replacement contributed to the suicide of one striking Machinist.

Workers want a fair contract, not a labor dispute, Souther said. Except for a strike in the 1970s, Malarkey and the union have gotten along for 50 years.

“They’re setting us up for a strike,” Souther says. “They’ve turned down everything we’ve asked for. We’re diehard employees for these guys, and it’s just sick the way they want to take us out.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read more