![]() |
March 20, 2009 Volume 110 Number 6
Strike ends at Oak Harbor, but Teamsters dispute continuesInternational
Brotherhood of Teamsters ended its unfair labor practice strike
at Oak Harbor Freight Lines, but the labor dispute isn’t over.
About 600 Teamsters members struck the privately-held regional trucking
company Sept. 22 — alleging, in five separate charges, that
the company had broken labor law. One of those charges was later
withdrawn, and another was dismissed by National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB) agent who investigated, but three minor charges were
found to have merit. The company agreed Jan. 30 to settle those
charges by changing some company practices and posting a workplace
notice.
Once the charges were settled, for union members to stay out would
have made it an “economic” strike, which would have
given Oak Harbor the right to permanently replace them. So Teamsters
International Vice-President Al Hobart announced Feb. 12 that strikers
were willing to return to work.
After several weeks of wrangling over the subject, Hobart made it
clear that the union return-to-work offer was unconditional. Some
drivers and dock workers returned the first week of March. But others
were laid off due to lack of work. The Everett, Washington, terminal
is closed altogether — temporarily, the company said. Business
is down due to the strike and economic conditions.
Teamsters say Oak Harbor lost more than half its business during
the strike. Striking drivers used their relationships with local
customers to get them to switch to other shippers, while a union
“corporate campaign” persuaded big companies like JC
Penney and The Gap to cancel accounts.
Workers returned without the protection of a union contract. Their
last contract expired Oct. 31, 2007. Oak Harbor imposed its own
terms on returning strikers. It ceased making contributions to the
Teamster-sponsored health and pension plans. Workers say the company
isn’t honoring seniority rules, and managers are doing the
work of bargaining unit members.
Oak Harbor also refused to return 13 workers, saying they were suspended
for supposed strike misconduct, and that more suspensions could
come. Meanwhile, anti-union workers —helped by the National
Right to Work Foundation — have petitioned the NLRB to decertify
the union at eight terminals: Auburn, Mt. Vernon, Pasco, Spokane,
and Wenatchee, Washington; Medford and Salem, Oregon; and Boise,
Idaho. The terminals, totaling 250 workers, make up nearly half
the company’s union membership. The NLRB has not yet set election
dates for workers at those terminals to vote on whether to stay
union.
Every indication is that Oak Harbor Freight Lines orchestrated
the entire conflict expressly to bust the union. Even before contract
negotiations began in 2007, Oak Harbor co-president David Vander
Pol told the Teamsters’ Hobart that company owners had met
with East Coast shipping company managers who’d defeated Teamster
strikes and eliminated the union, and that Oak Harbor was prepared
to pursue that. Up to two years before the strike, the company was
contracting to recruit striker replacements. To represent it in
bargaining, Oak Harbor hired a law firm that specializes in union
avoidance. And when the strike began, the company returned to operation
almost immediately, using workers brought in by a strikebreaking
temp agency. © Oregon Labor Press Publishing Co. Inc.
|