November 21, 2008 Volume 109 Number 22
Labor trounces Sizemore proposals ... again By
DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor
November 4 was a bad night for Bill Sizemore — the most
persistent antagonist of the Oregon union movement. Voters rejected
all five of his ballot initiatives, and voted yes on a legislative
referral that overturned one of his previous initiatives.
Sizemore may have intended to overwhelm Oregon unions with scattershot
proposals this year, but union campaigners say the measures ended
up energizing and unifying the union movement, and even firmed up
organized labor’s alliances with other groups.
Labor and its allies put more than $15 million into an umbrella
group, Defend Oregon, that was created to defeat the Sizemore measures
and two others sponsored by former Oregon Republican Party Chair
Kevin Mannix. Defend Oregon also helped to pass several referrals
from the state’s Democratic-majority Legislature.
Defend Oregon both pooled resources and divided up some of the
work of opposing similar measures. Associated campaigns were formed
under the Defend Oregon umbrella to fight specific measures. For
example, the Oregon Education Association (OEA) formed Parents and
Teachers Know Better — to fight Measures 58 and 60, the latter
of which would have instituted an ill-defined merit system and scrapped
cost-of-living increases and seniority rights for teachers. Building
trades unions teamed with Realtors and insurances companies and
formed Oregonians Against Unsafe Housing to fight Measure 63, which
would have allowed home improvements of up to $35,000 to take place
without permits or inspections. Public employee unions formed the
Don’t Silence Our Voice Committee to fight Measure 64, which
would have made it harder for public workers to give to their unions’
political campaigns. And the American Federation of State, County
and Municipal Employees, Service Employees International Union,
and OEA contributed to the Better Way to Fight Crime Committee,
which opposed Mannix’ measures 61 and 62 and supported a legislative
referral alternative.
Labor had help in opposing Measure 64. Though the measure was
chiefly aimed at politically disarming public employee unions, other
non-profit groups felt that the measure’s broad language was
loose enough to hamstring their fundraising as well. Groups like
the Sierra Club and Basic Rights Oregon had a stake in defeating
the measure, because both also get donations from state employee
workplace giving programs, and they take positions on legislation
in Salem. The Oregon Humane Society sent messages out to members
and supporters via e-mail and its newsletter.
“Everyone learned that when we do all stick together, we
all win together,” said Defend Oregon spokesperson Scott Moore.
Defend Oregon worked closely with the Oregon AFL-CIO and with
the Change to Win federation, both of which had their own high-intensity
political mobilizations going. From August to Election Day, coalition
allies met at least weekly in person or by conference call to coordinate.
Coalition partners, both unions and non-profit groups, worked
hard to educate their own members. To be a union member in Oregon
was to get friendly phone calls from fellow unionists — until
county elections offices recorded their ballot was received.
And the campaign got assists from Democratic candidates. For example,
volunteers who went door-to-door distributing literature for Jeff
Merkley’s U.S. Senate campaign also distributed Defend Oregon
material about ballot measures.
Defend Oregon also used its campaign resources to pay for television
ads, direct mail to voters, polling to test how well the messages
were getting out, and to hire the door-to-door canvass operation
of Working America — the AFL-CIO’s community affiliate.
In the end, both of the Mannix measures and all five of the Sizemore
measures went down to defeat. © Oregon Labor Press Publishing Co. Inc.
|